Search for: "Brown v. Fairchild" Results 1 - 11 of 11
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The Court emphasised that the relaxation of normal principles of proof in relation to mesothelioma claims, laid down by the House of Lords in the Fairchild case (Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22), apply only to the need to prove causation. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S.437 (2007); see also Brown v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:36 am by Charon QC
This followed the approach of the House of Lords decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven where the same test is applied where the Mesothelioma could have been caused by wrongful exposure to asbestos where there are two or more potential defendants. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
Lord Brown wondered at [78-79] why, if it was within the scope of the courts’ competence to change the law to accord with the judges’ perception of the contemporary demands of justice, why the same could not be done by Parliament. in such cases as Fairchild the House of Lords decided that causation should became easier for mesothelioma claimants to establish, what was the difference between that decision and the present?  [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
As Lord Brown identified at [80],  to justify such a change, under Art.6 case law,  one needs to show & [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
 After all the effect was the same; claims which would have failed under the old law, would succeed under the common law as now declared in Fairchild. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am by Kelly
Browne Drug Co., Inc (TTABlog) Don’t forget trade dress in your manufacturing agreements: District Court S D New York decision in Technimed SRL v Kidz-Med, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
Defining WIPO’s role (Intellectual Property Watch) Introduction to patent monetisation resources for corporations and entrepreneurs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Top PCT filing firms revealed (IAM) Commercialising innovation mini-series – interview with industrial designer Jim Richardson (IP Watchdog) Royalty triggers are fraught with litigation risk, so handle with care (Technology Transfer Tactics) The IP zone: a new concept for introducing needed information and efficiencies into… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]